Tuesday, May 26, 2009
There are many states that have religious, medical, or moral exemptions for vaccinations. You may think that you are exempt or that you can refuse. Sadly, depending on your state laws, You can be forced to roll up those sleeves an take a vaccination that has had no clinical trials and could possibly cause you to be infected with a horrible disease like Guillain-Barre Syndrome that came from Swine Flu Vaccinations in 1977. There were more deaths as a result of the vaccinations of Swine Flu than from the actual Swine Flu in that Period of time.
The State Law (statutes) in Tennessee:
37-10-402. Conflict with religious tenets and practices of parent. —
In the absence of an epidemic or immediate threat thereof, this section does not apply to any child whose parent or guardian files with proper authorities a signed, written statement that such immunization and other preventative measures conflict with the religious tenets and practices of the parent or guardian affirmed under penalties of perjury.
[Acts 1993, ch. 377, § 1.]
I can not opt-out of the Flu shot if there is a "threat" of a epidemic. It doesn't have to be REAL - just the threat. I may be crazy BUT Before the Government tramples my rights, I think there should be a good reason. The possible threat of a epidemic which isn't really causing mass casualties is NOT good enough to justify forced vaccinations to myself, my son, a perfect stranger, or someone's premie baby.
The Government doesn't have the right to stop me from taking a walk in a Thunderstorm. They should not have the right to inject me when the walk in the thunderstorm and the "threat of lightning" actually poses more of a danger than this Media Hyped H1N1 Hoax!
Tennessee is not the only state that has laws like this. Look them up in your area! Hawaii (HRS § 302A-1157 )will not recognize exemptions if there is "danger of a epidemic" and can legally quarantine you if you refuse. Oregon ( 433.121)can quarantine you if a local health administrator decides there is a probable cause that you might infect someone. Massachusetts (Ch 76: Sect 15) does not allow exemptions during an epidemic or Emergency. Missouri (191.235) allows for any regulations regarding Mercury in the vaccinations can be bypassed during an epidemic or potential health emergency. Missouri ( 190.091) also allows for First responders to be forcefully vaccinated if their boss say so and they can only opt-out with a written statement from a doctor.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety " is inscribed on a plaque at the Statue of Liberty. Are you willing to up your Liberty for a little safety? Are you willing to give up your Liberty for something that is potentially UNSAFE?
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Swatting and other types of hoaxes can be done over VOIP (voice over internet protocol) phones such as Skype and Vonage who use an IP address (Internet protocol address). A hacker can steal the IP address and the person receiving the call such as 911, or in this case a college who received a bomb threat, would on their caller ID get the number of the phone which was hacked and not the hacker.
As you can see in this case, it is hard to prove your case when the FBI believes you to be at fault. On Alex Jones' radio show the mother of the 16 year old was a guest. She said, at the time of the bomb threat the kid was at church with many witnesses. Even though he has an alibi, he has been in jail for over 2 months and is to be tried as an adult for his "crime". The FBI testified that there was no such thing as IP hacking and that it was like a finger print that could by no means be disproved.
Here is another example of "Swatting" or IP phone hacking that happened in my area.
(Sorry, it would not let me link to, or embed the video)
I thought in my country, people were innocent until proven guilty. What ever happened to reasonable doubt?
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Though not being reported to the American people by their propaganda media organs, the United States Northern Command Military Leader, US Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, and his Canadian counterpart, Air Force Lt.-Gen. Marc Dumais [both pictured top left] announced this new Military Pact this past week, and as we can read:
"U.S. Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, left, commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, and Canadian Air Force Lt.-Gen. Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command, signed a Civil Assistance Plan that allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency. The signing took place at U.S. Army North headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, Feb. 14, 2008."
It is interesting to note, too, that the Canadian peoples, like their American neighbors to the south, were not told of these plans for their Military Forces, and as we can read as reported by Canada’s Canwest News Service, and who say:
"Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other’s borders during an emergency, but some are questioning why the Harper government has kept silent on the deal.
Neither the Canadian government nor the Canadian Forces announced the new agreement, which was signed Feb. 14 in Texas."
The more likely use of these Canadian Troops on American Soil, these reports go on to say, would be for the patrolling of US Cities during times of civil war, internal unrest, or, most fearfully, the assisting of US Police in the rounding up of masses of US Citizens for arrest and internment.
This assessment of the truest intentions of the United States War Leaders granting power over their own citizens to Canadian Special Forces Troops, appears to be supported by information coming from US Troops returning from Iraq, and as we can read as reported by the Prison Planet News Service in their report titled "U.S. Troops Asked If They Would Shoot American Citizens", and which says:
"U.S. troops are being trained to conduct round-ups, confiscate guns and shoot American citizens, including their own friends and family members, as part of a long-standing program to prepare for the declaration of martial law, according to a soldier who recently returned from Iraq."
An estimated timeline in these reports states that the American people could begin seeing Canadian Soldiers in their cities as early as this summer, as many experts are predicting that the massive food shortages being reported all around the World will begin causing food riots in many American cities.
To how bad the Global Food Crisis is becoming we can read as reported by Australia’s Adelaide Now News Service, and which says:
"A WORSENING global food shortage is a problem far more urgent than climate change, top Australian scientists have warned.
The problem was more urgent even than climate change, said Professor Cribb, from the University of Technology in Sydney, because it will get us first . . . through famine and war. "By 2050 we will have to feed the equivalent of 13 billion people at today's levels of nutrition," he said.
"This situation brings with it the very real possibility of regional and global instability. Investment in global food stability is now defence spending and requires proportionate priority."
There remains no evidence to suggest, either, that the American people themselves are aware of the brutal future being planned for them. Even more sadly, perhaps, is the evidence suggesting that they don’t even want to know.
(sorry I didn't set these links, I was in a hurry ;) )
Thursday, February 12, 2009
One Actor, One Room, Seven Characters: Traumatized by the September 11th attacks, one man struggles to dismantle official history, at the expense of his sanity and even his life. Grappling with multiple realities - and multiple personalities - he must retreat into his mind in pursuit of the truth. In a fictional film about non-fictional events, there is a place where belief and faith will blind you, where nothing is sacred, and to get there all you have to do is ask: "Who Killed John O'Neill?" a dead art film by Ty Rauber and Ryan Thurston.
Saturday, February 7, 2009
When people exchange goods and services without using money, this is called barter. "I'll cook dinner if you'll do the dishes" is an example of barter.
Imagine an economy in which I can sell services as a consultant to banks, but what I want is to buy a new suit. The clothing store that sells suits does not have any use for my services as a banking consultant. The bank does not sell suits. How can barter work?
One can imagine a computer system that finds a bank that wants my consulting services, a clothing store that needs banking services, and then arranges a three-way trade where I get my suit in exchange for consulting services. As the economy gets more complex, the computer system has to arrange barter trades that are more and more elaborate.
Instead of a computerized bartering system, we use money to implement complex exchanges. I sell consulting services for money, and I buy a suit using money. Money serves as a medium of exchange.
Using money, my exchange of consulting services for a new suit is not simultaneous. The transactions take place at different points in time. For this to work, money must hold its value over time. Thus, money also acts as a store of value. I can hold onto money for a few days without having it lose value.
When money is established as a medium of exchange, people get used to calculating value in terms of money. Thus, money becomes a unit of account. Using money as a unit of account breaks down if we are doing cross-country comparisons. A Canadian dollar and a U.S. dollar are not the same.
Commodity Money and Fiat MoneyCommodity money consists of objects that have value but which are used as a medium of exchange. Pretty shells could serve as commodity money. Gold jewelry can serve as commodity money. Among prisoners, cigarettes often serve as commodity money.
As a practical matter, money is anything that is widely accepted in exchange. With commodity money, people will want to hold onto valuable samples and to use the least valuable samples for payment. Thus, among prisoners, the least popular cigarettes will end up being used as currency. This tendency for the least valuable currency to circulate is known as Gresham's Law.
Fiat money is something that has no intrinsic value, but which the government declares by fiat to be money. If you look at a dollar bill, you will see the phrase "legal tender for all debts, public and private." What that means is that if someone sells you something and you "tender" the currency (offer the currency as payment), you have legally paid, whether or not the seller accepts your currency. By making U.S. currency legal tender in this country, the government forces people to accept it as a medium of exchange.
With the concept of fiat money, the government can turn worthless pieces of paper into something of value. The reason that people value money is that it allows for complex exchanges to take place more easily than using barter.
The difference between the value of goods and services that a dollar can buy and the cost of printing the dollar represents a profit to the government, or a form of taxation. This tax is called seignorage.
Surviving The Global Depression - Soviet Style 1 of 2
Surviving The Global Depression - Soviet Style 2 of 2
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Obama calls for a New World Order
A new America through economic integration with Mexico and Canada
North American Union question for Ron Paul during the presidential debates of 2008
Kissinger calls on Obama to create a New World Order 1/5/2009
Ron Paul on the North American Union
Another CNN broadcast about the North American Union